<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The secret origins of del.icio.us</title>
	<link>http://www.mullingitover.com/wpress/2005/02/18/the-secret-origins-of-delicious/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Barry</title>
		<link>http://www.mullingitover.com/wpress/2005/02/18/the-secret-origins-of-delicious/#comment-387</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2005 19:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mullingitover.com/wpress/2005/02/18/the-secret-origins-of-delicious/#comment-387</guid>
					<description>That's probably true.  I still worry about the security hazards to the site because I like it so much.  I'm sure there are many safeguards in place to prevent the site from automated assault, but it's still worrysome.

del.icio.us is great, but I must say I'm a bit hesitant to put all my eggs in one basket when the basket is proprietary.  It has been great to have it as a completely free service, but there is no gurantee that it will continue to be this way in the future.  Unless someone protects the concept from patent by releasing it under a public license, I'll continue to worry.  Hopefully, and I'm optimistic, the concept of public, shared bookmards will spread and permeate into bulletin boards, blogs, and more.  It seems like a way of helping the internet learn, by building paths to better connect the nodes.  It would be maddening to have a SCO jump in and claim to own the idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s probably true.  I still worry about the security hazards to the site because I like it so much.  I&#8217;m sure there are many safeguards in place to prevent the site from automated assault, but it&#8217;s still worrysome.</p>
<p>del.icio.us is great, but I must say I&#8217;m a bit hesitant to put all my eggs in one basket when the basket is proprietary.  It has been great to have it as a completely free service, but there is no gurantee that it will continue to be this way in the future.  Unless someone protects the concept from patent by releasing it under a public license, I&#8217;ll continue to worry.  Hopefully, and I&#8217;m optimistic, the concept of public, shared bookmards will spread and permeate into bulletin boards, blogs, and more.  It seems like a way of helping the internet learn, by building paths to better connect the nodes.  It would be maddening to have a SCO jump in and claim to own the idea.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: George Hotelling</title>
		<link>http://www.mullingitover.com/wpress/2005/02/18/the-secret-origins-of-delicious/#comment-385</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 16:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mullingitover.com/wpress/2005/02/18/the-secret-origins-of-delicious/#comment-385</guid>
					<description>I don't think it's security reasons that he doesn't open the source.  Part of the del.icio.us magic is the fact that a network's value is the square of the number of nodes.  

If everyone had their own del.icio.us site then we wouldn't be able to aggregate tags, we wouldn't have a popular page and we couldn't stumble on people with great links as easily.  All those things happen because everyone is on the same site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s security reasons that he doesn&#8217;t open the source.  Part of the del.icio.us magic is the fact that a network&#8217;s value is the square of the number of nodes.  </p>
<p>If everyone had their own del.icio.us site then we wouldn&#8217;t be able to aggregate tags, we wouldn&#8217;t have a popular page and we couldn&#8217;t stumble on people with great links as easily.  All those things happen because everyone is on the same site.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
