<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Were the levees bombed?</title>
	<link>http://www.mullingitover.com/wpress/2005/09/07/were-the-levees-bombed/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.mullingitover.com/wpress/2005/09/07/were-the-levees-bombed/#comment-5412</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 23:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mullingitover.com/wpress/2005/09/07/were-the-levees-bombed/#comment-5412</guid>
					<description>It seems reasonable that Bush would want the catastrophy in order to extend civilian control by the military via FEMA, and to give more money to the Halliburtons. It's obvious that no governmental agency was actually trying to save the civilians, they were pawns in another 9-11 type scenario.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems reasonable that Bush would want the catastrophy in order to extend civilian control by the military via FEMA, and to give more money to the Halliburtons. It&#8217;s obvious that no governmental agency was actually trying to save the civilians, they were pawns in another 9-11 type scenario.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brendan Merritt</title>
		<link>http://www.mullingitover.com/wpress/2005/09/07/were-the-levees-bombed/#comment-3277</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 18:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mullingitover.com/wpress/2005/09/07/were-the-levees-bombed/#comment-3277</guid>
					<description>Evidence of Explosives Found at Levee Break
Hal Turner / TurnerShow.com

NEW ORLEANS (September 9, 2005) -- Divers inspecting the ruptured levee walls surrounding New Orleans found something that piqued their interest: Burn marks on underwater debris chunks from the broken levee wall!

One diver, a member of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, saw the burn marks and knew immediately what caused them. He secreted a small chunk of the cement inside his diving suit and later arranged for it to be sent to trusted military friends at a The US Army Forensic Laboratory at Fort Gillem, Georgia for testing.

According to well placed sources, a military forensic specialist determined the burn marks on the cement chunks did, in fact, come from high-explosives. The source, speaking on condition of anonymity said &quot;We found traces of boron-enhanced fluoronitramino explosives as well as PBXN-111. This would indicate at least two separate types of explosive devices.&quot;

The levee ruptures in New Orleans did not take place during Hurricane Katrina, but rather a day after the hurricane struck. Several residents of New Orleans and many Emergency Workers reported hearing what sounded like large, muffled explosions from the area of the levee, but those were initially discounted as gas explosions from homes with leaking gas lines.

If these allegations prove true, the ruptured levee which flooded New Orleans was a deliberate act of mass destruction perpetrated by someone with access to military-grade UNDERWATER high explosives.

NOTE
Hal Turner, a New York based broadcaster, is shock-jock with racist leanings. He is virulently pro-property and anti-police and, as the following list of stories from his Web site indicate, he is a virulent racist. Still, the suggestion about explosive residue at the levee site deserves attention. Turner is a bozo, but he may have stumbled across something that the media needs to investigate further.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evidence of Explosives Found at Levee Break<br />
Hal Turner / TurnerShow.com</p>
<p>NEW ORLEANS (September 9, 2005) &#8212; Divers inspecting the ruptured levee walls surrounding New Orleans found something that piqued their interest: Burn marks on underwater debris chunks from the broken levee wall!</p>
<p>One diver, a member of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, saw the burn marks and knew immediately what caused them. He secreted a small chunk of the cement inside his diving suit and later arranged for it to be sent to trusted military friends at a The US Army Forensic Laboratory at Fort Gillem, Georgia for testing.</p>
<p>According to well placed sources, a military forensic specialist determined the burn marks on the cement chunks did, in fact, come from high-explosives. The source, speaking on condition of anonymity said &#8220;We found traces of boron-enhanced fluoronitramino explosives as well as PBXN-111. This would indicate at least two separate types of explosive devices.&#8221;</p>
<p>The levee ruptures in New Orleans did not take place during Hurricane Katrina, but rather a day after the hurricane struck. Several residents of New Orleans and many Emergency Workers reported hearing what sounded like large, muffled explosions from the area of the levee, but those were initially discounted as gas explosions from homes with leaking gas lines.</p>
<p>If these allegations prove true, the ruptured levee which flooded New Orleans was a deliberate act of mass destruction perpetrated by someone with access to military-grade UNDERWATER high explosives.</p>
<p>NOTE<br />
Hal Turner, a New York based broadcaster, is shock-jock with racist leanings. He is virulently pro-property and anti-police and, as the following list of stories from his Web site indicate, he is a virulent racist. Still, the suggestion about explosive residue at the levee site deserves attention. Turner is a bozo, but he may have stumbled across something that the media needs to investigate further.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
