<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The sun, it burns!</title>
	<link>http://www.mullingitover.com/wpress/2006/03/22/the-sun-it-burns/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: CHUCK BAKER</title>
		<link>http://www.mullingitover.com/wpress/2006/03/22/the-sun-it-burns/#comment-6564</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 14:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mullingitover.com/wpress/2006/03/22/the-sun-it-burns/#comment-6564</guid>
					<description>Barry,
Yo Lasix keeps getting better and better: The surgeon who did mine told me on the followup that if I'd had it done two months later, I could have used their fancy schmancy new machine that promises 15/15. fuck-ER. At any rate, hope yr. doin' well. Does Diz give ya a couple o' days to adjust?
C-
p.s.
M.V.:
Got my Lasix from &quot;TLC&quot; and they're great.  They did Tiger Woods and a raft of pro baseball pitchers, etc.  Very uptown
and the most comprehensive eye exam (free) ever. I had 300/500 vision w/astigmatism (sp?) and all that's gone now.  The down side is that if you're over, say, 45 or so you'll probably still have to wear glasses to read if they correct for near-sightedness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry,<br />
Yo Lasix keeps getting better and better: The surgeon who did mine told me on the followup that if I&#8217;d had it done two months later, I could have used their fancy schmancy new machine that promises 15/15. fuck-ER. At any rate, hope yr. doin&#8217; well. Does Diz give ya a couple o&#8217; days to adjust?<br />
C-<br />
p.s.<br />
M.V.:<br />
Got my Lasix from &#8220;TLC&#8221; and they&#8217;re great.  They did Tiger Woods and a raft of pro baseball pitchers, etc.  Very uptown<br />
and the most comprehensive eye exam (free) ever. I had 300/500 vision w/astigmatism (sp?) and all that&#8217;s gone now.  The down side is that if you&#8217;re over, say, 45 or so you&#8217;ll probably still have to wear glasses to read if they correct for near-sightedness.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mr. Viddy</title>
		<link>http://www.mullingitover.com/wpress/2006/03/22/the-sun-it-burns/#comment-6430</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 06:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mullingitover.com/wpress/2006/03/22/the-sun-it-burns/#comment-6430</guid>
					<description>I'd venture to guess that it is the latter of your final statements?  Good luck with the LASIK though, I looked into it but I've been a four eyes for so long that I really do feel uncomfortable without my glasses now, and I just got some real funky fresh new frames.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d venture to guess that it is the latter of your final statements?  Good luck with the LASIK though, I looked into it but I&#8217;ve been a four eyes for so long that I really do feel uncomfortable without my glasses now, and I just got some real funky fresh new frames.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
